Sounds to me like the Daily Mail writers don't know the difference between an attraction to a body part and an erogenous zone. They read the study and jump to crazy conclusions by mixing up the two .
The study was clearly rating the erogenousossitty of parts, not the attraction of them to others.
Can't believe my phone let me write that word!
The study was clearly rating the erogenousossitty of parts, not the attraction of them to others.
Can't believe my phone let me write that word!