This is what ticks me off though.
“The sports medicine literature does report an increase in overuse injuries in runners who transitioned from shod running to unshod.”
In recent years, McConnell has seen several runners for stress injuries, including elite level runners, where the only training regimen change was a switch to minimalist shoe wear.
They say one thing in one sentence and then the very opposite in the very next sentence. It's not unshod running that is seeing a rise in running injuries. It's running in minshoes. As long as they keep calling minshoe injuries barefoot injuries, we will never get to the truth. I'll wager the number of true barefoot runners being seen in the doctors office for an actual barefoot running injury is so small that it doesn't warrant a note in the sports medicine literature. At what point are they going to start calling an apple an apple?