Risks and Benefits in Transitioning To Barefoot/Minimal Footwear Running

On The Measurement of Running Style 1:
Risks and Benefits in Transitioning To Barefoot/Minimal Footwear Running


All, (From Martin Daumer, PhD)

This has taken quite some time: The paper based on the study we had done with your (BRS) support has finally been published (paper attached)!

Please feel free to distribute widely - we would really like to thank all the runners who have contributed with their experience to help other runners to avoid injuries.

Best regards,

Martin

Jacobs Journal of Sports Medicine
On The Measurement of Running Style 1: Risks and Benefits in Transitioning To Barefoot/Minimal Footwear Running (www.thebarefootrunners.org/misc/J_J_Sport_Med_2_3_014.pdf)

Methods - A survey with the social network of the “barefoot runners society.” An online questionnaire was set up using Google forms (fig. 1, see Pages 6&7) and advertised by the “barefoot runners society” website (http://thebarefootrunners.org/threa...d-vs-minimal-footwear-barefoot-runners.12871/ twice (see fig. 2)
with an automatic post on Facebook and Twitter and by the online-newsletter and Facebook of the “freeheel runningpad” ( https://www.facebook.com/RunningPad).

Prior: There is an ongoing debate about the benefits and risks of running in minimal footwear and barefoot instead of running in "normal" running shoes. Martin Daumer, inventor of FreeHeel Running Pads, and a team of students from TUM Munich (from the lecture "clinical applications of computational medicine" headed by the inventor of the "FreeHeel Running Pads" Martin Daumer--http://www.rcs.ei.tum.de/fileadmin/tueircs/www/clinical-applications-daumer/Flyer_CA12.pdf) plan to collect information about the association between running injuries and footwear. You are eligible to go through the questionnaire if you are used to running with traditional running shoes some time ago but now, after a certain transition phase, you are running mostly either in minimal footwear or barefoot. We will not collect any personal information about you. Results of the survey and comments will be published.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yvonne and gokuflip
Interesting.

I find a few things of particular note:
  1. The regular references to runners who "Survived" the transition phase: Makes it easier for the reader assume that there's an entire additional dataset from runners who tried bf/m running but did not transition over. Obviously, the post-transition information wouldn't exist for anyone who didn't "survive" the transition period.
  2. The average age of Male responders being 40 and transition age was in their mid-late 30's: This in itself is significant, as incidents of any type of use/overuse injuries and longer recovery times increase with age.
  3. The post-transition average # of injuries of 3.5 per 10,000km m/bf compared to 8 per 10,000km shod: This data seems to be regarded as completely insignificant.
My takeaway - based on the results of this study, a male in their mid-late 30's could potentially reduce the number and severity of running related injuries by over 55% by successfully transitioning to BF/M running. Which is the opposite conclusion the authors of the study came to. Apparently this significant rate of injury reduction is considered "..weak evidence of beneficial affect of barefoot running.."

Food for thought when reading one of these studies - how many other physically demanding sports/activities do people start being involved in or retrain themselves for in their late 30's? How many of those actually have "best practice" guides or trainers/coaches to help with that and what are the injury rates experienced during those learning/transitioning process?
 
Interesting.

I find a few things of particular note:
  1. The regular references to runners who "Survived" the transition phase: Makes it easier for the reader assume that there's an entire additional dataset from runners who tried bf/m running but did not transition over. Obviously, the post-transition information wouldn't exist for anyone who didn't "survive" the transition period.
  2. The average age of Male responders being 40 and transition age was in their mid-late 30's: This in itself is significant, as incidents of any type of use/overuse injuries and longer recovery times increase with age.
  3. The post-transition average # of injuries of 3.5 per 10,000km m/bf compared to 8 per 10,000km shod: This data seems to be regarded as completely insignificant.
My takeaway - based on the results of this study, a male in their mid-late 30's could potentially reduce the number and severity of running related injuries by over 55% by successfully transitioning to BF/M running. Which is the opposite conclusion the authors of the study came to. Apparently this significant rate of injury reduction is considered "..weak evidence of beneficial affect of barefoot running.."

Food for thought when reading one of these studies - how many other physically demanding sports/activities do people start being involved in or retrain themselves for in their late 30's? How many of those actually have "best practice" guides or trainers/coaches to help with that and what are the injury rates experienced during those learning/transitioning process?


Kyr, I asked Dr. Daumer to respond to your post, and this is what he said:


Dear TJ,

Thank you very much for your message! I think that the paper and the corresponding information at PeerJ https://peerj.com/preprints/250/ contains the relevant information.

I'll keep an eye on the comments and will post something if needed.

Best,

Martin
 

Support Your Club

Forum statistics

Threads
19,150
Messages
183,608
Members
8,696
Latest member
Barefoot RPS

Latest posts