“Asics Have Really Dug in Their ‘Heels’!” Shared with us by our friends at www.zero-drop.com

heelstriker_0.jpg

It's hard to tell the shoe brand here, but if Asics had its way, all runnersshould be perfectly content to continue as over-striding, heel-strikers.
“Asics Have Really Dug in Their ‘Heels’!”

Shared with us by our friends at www.zero-drop.com

A friend just sent me the following post by Asics head of research Simon Bartold that recently appeared on a Podiatry Arena thread:

Well Dr. Kirby,A big thank you! Here was I thinking I was the only one fighting a rearguard battle to bring scientific debate to this nonsense!First we had to deal with barefoot, and now the so called Minimalist running debate. It just gets sooo frustrating.What I find fascinating however is that Joe Hammil was intimately involved in the NB minimalist project. A little bit of a pity they did not do this research BEFORE they designed the shoe.

We (ASICS) are now working on a training shoe that is less structure and lightweight, but still offering stability and holding true to a rearfoot srike pattern design. I have based this on the premise that, no matter what is being said about technical running footwear, there is no evidence that it really 'aint broken, so we will tweak, but no need to fix. The minimalist movement works on the premise that by reducing heel height, i.e. the overall gradient,by maybe 6 mm, it induces a midfoot or even forefoot strike pattern. I have ot been able to identify one single piece of credible evidence to support this.. so.. we will stick to our guns.Once more the ether is thick with unsupportable nonsense.. pose, chi, toning barefoot, minimalist....when will it end?

My friend then shrewdly commented to me, "Asics have really dug in their 'heels!"' In Zero Drop's humble opinion, Asics research head honcho sounds like one of those very-much-in-the-minority anti-climate change "scientists" who tries to refute global warming data, or a paid tobacco lobbyist who maintains that's there's no proof that smoking causes cancer. In the fast-shifting footwear biz, you either lead from the front or you stay back in the rear; Asics is obviously hanging out in the rear in more ways than one.

Be sure to check out the comment thread over at Zero Drop at www.zero-drop.com.
 
The analogy with Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is just wrong! Asics are in the majority not the minority (look at the running shoes in your local sports store anywhere in the world) Asics are building on the successful business model invented by Nike - this being a massive public relations success. Asics would then be comparable with the "consensus" who accept the similar massive PR phenomenon of AGW despite there being zero valid scientific data to back it up.

All of the original tennets behind the first Koyoto Protocol have been proven to be wrong. The famous "hockey stick" curve exploited later by Al Gore was shown to be caused by an omission of data - later found on the same hard drive by another scientist. The Vladivostock ice core samples that correlated CO2 and global temperatures were later shown to be completely the wrong way around - the temperature rises first then the CO2 goes up! The entire business is dependent on mathematical models that are inherently unreliable - the list is endless!

Science doesn't work by "consensus" but politics and funding do. So does marketing. The guy jogging on his heels in his expensive Asics will no doubt be an employee of Al Gore - the first predicted billionaire from controlling the sale of carbon credits (through Goldman Sachs investment and in the UK)- and basically destroying Western economy, stifling development in poor countries and landing you with one massive hike in your cost of living - plus a massive drop in your standard of living. Why? Perhaps jogging on the heels damages the brain.